AMITIAE - Wednesday 3 May 2013
Cassandra - Friday Review: Apple, iOS 7 and Uncritical Reporting |
|
By Graham K. Rogers
Opening GambitAnalysts: the good, the bad and the uncritical clones. News on iOS 7 WWDC expectations. iOS 7: late, delayed, right on schedule. Drive by analysts. Whom did Shaw Wu upset?The Cassandra column is in two parts this time as the news on iOS 7 and uncritical jounalism - bad news makes hits - grew to such an extent that I felt separation was the best answer. Cassandra for Wednesday is available as usual.
Apple iOS 7 and Poor ReportingSeveral sources I looked at on Wednesday evening were trying to make the point that Jony Ive's work on iOS 7 may cause it to be delayed. OK, that is OK, but there were too many similarities and all were traced back to a Bloomberg report, so I had a look at what appeared to be a prime source. Oh my word, Adam Santariano has a long, long article on Ive and the background to his work at Apple and the way he is a lynch pin in the whole design philosophy of the company. Somewhere in there, he has picked up on the design problems and using a speculative comment from an unnamed source, has (perhaps accidentally) created another "Apple disaster" meme.But then I had a closer look at the point that was being made: that iOS 7 was to be delayed until September. Delayed? What a crock? Too much headline-chasing and not enoough journalism here.
You have the picture? So with last year's WWDC in June as usual, when was iOS 6 released? Not June or even July, but 20 September 2012 (at least that was when I wrote about it) along with an OS X update to 10.8.2 (Mountain Lion was released in July), by which time I had already completed my A-Z of Sytem Preferences and was writing about Terminal. Mountain Lion arrived 25 July here.
Also commenting, in a typically brief fashion, is Jim Dalrymple on The Loop who picks up the article by John Paczkowski on AllThings Digital (that Neil Hughes also used). Some good comment in that item about what simplifications may be made (mercifully).
But he had written something else on analysts that I read earlier in the day and this fits perfectly with my views on the utter rubbish that some of these instant experts on Apple have been dishing out for the last few months. Ernie Varitmos calls these "drive by analysts": the ones who have never got it right. The article has some justifiably harsh criticism of most analysts: criticism which I think is right, as much of the advice some of these have been giving their investors over the last few months concerning Apple has been wrong over and over again as well as filled with unsubstantiated speculation.
Ignore the analysts, they know nothing. It is only guesswork, at best supported by a small amount of data from component suppliers, and that has been found to be false over and over again.
Not one of those rumours was correct.
Graham K. Rogers teaches at the Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University in Thailand. He wrote in the Bangkok Post, Database supplement on IT subjects. For the last seven years of Database he wrote a column on Apple and Macs. |
|
For further information, e-mail to