AMITIAE - Wednesday 1 May 2013
Cassandra - Wednesday Review: The Week in Full Swing |
|
By Graham K. Rogers
Opening GambitWWDC expectations: iOS 7 with the hand of Ives; and OS X for power users. Rumours on new products, despite Tim Cook's caveat: new iPhones again; MacBook Pro, MacBook Air. Russian billionaire invests in Apple. Trump wants to use his investment to make an 5" iPhone. Enderle drivel on Cook: wrong on several fronts again. Changes to advertising on iOS. Mobile is big but only takes 20% of advertising investment. A real drop test on Samsung Galaxy 3, 4 and the iPhone: the iPhone does best. Samsung's Mediocre S4 Reviews Are Bad News for Apple: that is a serious article, guys. DoJ to insist on a backdoor for more surveillance. David Ferrer tweets his love for Samsung Galaxy from an iPhone. Vivitar extension tubes for macro photography.
Apple StuffWith the news that WWDC is on the way, rumours turn to what we might be seeing in June. There are some fair ideas and some not so smart rumours. Of course we may expect news of iOS 7 and OS X 10.9 and one item of news concerned the work of Jony Ive on the interface.We know that he did not see things concerning skeuomorphism the same way as Steve Jobs or Scott Forestall, but now he is in control there so his ideas are likely to hold sway and a simpler interface is expected. Mark Gurman on 9to5 Mac among many others, suggest that the new display will have "a level of flatness approaching recent releases of Microsoft's Windows Phone Metro." Heaven forfend, say I, especially as Gurman's article had a screen shot of Metro: that is so confusing, especially for us simpletons using iOS. The article does continue with some useful comments about possible changes, especially to that leather look for Contacts and also the interface of Calendar. I far preferred the clean look of earlier versions: nothing to get in the way. Taking up the idea of the alleged flatness of the new iOS 7 design, Rene Ritchie sounds dubious when he asks How flat is too flat and asks readers to respond. It is also suggested by MacNN (and a number of other sources) that there will be much more in-car integration. As a number of car manufacturers are already thinking along these lines with some closely working with Apple, this sounds right.
Was Tim Cook telling porkies? And not just Tim Cook. The cofee with Tim auction that reached over $600,000 has been put back online as the winning bid was found to have been made with a stolen credit card (MacDaily News).
Well, some of the things Cook said, and some of the changes Apple have clearly been making to the way the finances are being handled, as outlined by Patently Apple has pleased some people and I see that late Tuesday the share price was up to $434 and rising. MacDaily News commented earlier that Apple had retaken that "Most Valuable Publicly Traded Company" title from Exxon. The shares jumped another $7 while I was sitting about Tuesday evening to reach $441, closing at just under $443.
And this is the perfect time to bring in Rob Enderle who, MacDaily News tells us, thinks Tim Cook is toast. MDN has one of its "Think Before You Click" warnings (rightly) but I did and the Enderle article is awash with errors and some lovely quotes that should be remembered and thrown back at a suitable time, like "Did Cook really miss everything Jobs should have taught him . . . or is there a plan afoot that we don't understand" We? . . . It gets better as the thesis is that Jobs thought he was going to survive his cancer [so why arrange for a biography to be written? Oh never mind] and put Cook in the CEO position "because Jobs knew he couldn't do the job and would be an excellent placeholder". Enderle manages to eke this out to 2 pages (click on his advertising, please) and criticises Cook for the new Apple HQ. The same Apple HQ that Steve Jobs presented at a Cupertino Council meeting. MDN was right on that "Think Before You Click." I can't wait for the Macalope to trample all over this. Kate MacKenzie on PixoBebo was on it right away.
Although some analysts quote the number of devices shipped (not sold) which appears to make Android devices the leaders in the market place, actual use on the Internet, either through browsing or the use of apps suggests a different story. And use means money. The market for advertisement revenue is vast and not yet fully realised. Another item I picked up from the Bloomberg TV coverage I was watching was an interview with Sir Martin Sorrel head of WPP one of the world's largest ad agencies, who says that currently advertising investment in print media is high (too high), but that mobile with a far larger user base is under invested at 20%. It is expected that advertising revenues from iOS could increase soon, Ben Lovejoy reports for 9to5Mac, as Apple is changing from the use of the UDID in the light of privacy concerns, to something called the IFA - or ID For Advertisers - which should clear up some legal compliance questions and Apple is ahead of the game on this.
Half and HalfSome while back I commented on the Android device tester who was surprised and appeared almost upset in the video he made of a fairly unscientific drop test that he did on an iPhone and a Samsung Galaxy S3 in Hong Kong. Despite slightly different methods of throwing or dropping the devices, the plastic Samsung was the one that fared the worst.Now a new test is reported by KSFY that was done by a company called Square Trade that uses more scientific (read, unbiased) methods and has a breakability score index. They tested the Samsung Galaxy S4, comparing it to the S3 and the iPhone 5 and report that "the iPhone 5 was the clear winner". While looking for that earlier drop test (and here is a link that has the video) I saw that the latest results were widely reported by a number of sites.
Other MattersWith the recent court case in which Motorola got a tiny fraction of what it had been asking for RAND patent licensing, there were immediate questions about why Google had bought the company (and what happened to all that Do no Evil idea). After a couple of days, the dust has settled, but the question, Why? remains. Nilay Patel on The Verge attempts to deal with this in an article titled, "Does anyone know why Google bought Motorola?" (John Gruber's comment was "Nope").
Local ItemsI recently bought some Vivitar extension tubes for my camera. These are sections that fit between a lens and the camera body to extend the focal point and are useful in macro photography. They come in three sizes (the body height) of 12mm, 20mm and 36mm and can be used individually or connected.With my usual 24mm lens I can use the 12mm and 20mm extensions, but not the 36mm one, and certainly not all joined together. Changing the lens to one of those cheap ones that come with camera kits and has 18 - 70 settings allowed me to use the 36mm and a combination, but with all of these I cannot be so cavalier with light, nor with aperture as the depth of field is important with such close-ups. Why the Vivitar (and I am quite pleased with this)? I narrowed my choices down to 4, when I looked on Amazon, but with three of them, Amazon would not ship here. The Vivitar was a touch more expensive than the others (about $10 more) but at least I now have this. Time for some practice.
Graham K. Rogers teaches at the Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University in Thailand. He wrote in the Bangkok Post, Database supplement on IT subjects. For the last seven years of Database he wrote a column on Apple and Macs. |
|
For further information, e-mail to