AMITIAE - Monday 29 April 2013
Cassandra - Monday Review: It will Soon be Friday |
|
By Graham K. Rogers
Opening GambitWWDC: what does the icon mean; more tickets for a lucky few. Apple's new financial arrangements: borrowing will reduce the tax bill. Lower margins: higher cost of components. Apple and Samsung smartphone share: up or down, depending on how the stats are skewed. Best tablet as far as consumers are concerned: iPad again. The utter crap that analysts put out: listen to these guys at your peril. AutoCad, Autodesk and Apple. Coffee with Cook, now over $600,000. Samsung revenue decreases: Apple has left the building. Motorola wanted $4 billion for patent licences; the judge says $1.8 million. Cyberbunker boss arrested in Spain
Apple StuffBefore the news of Apple's Q2 results had died down, there was the announcement of the WWDC at San Francisco in June and tickets sold out in 2-3 minutes (depending on the source you read). As ever, observers try to discern meaning in Apple's invitations and logos and the one for this year's WWDC is a little odd.Nonetheless, Ashleigh Allsopp on MacWorld does a little analysis and thinks that clues are in the typeface (not standard Apple), which may indicate design simplicity - bear in mind that Jony Ive is now killing off skeuomorphism; secondly, the date is in Roman numerals (is this for the iWatch? - Tim Cook says nothing new before Fall); logo shape is like an iOS app icon, so is that indicative of an interface redesign, or a TV; colours - bright - could indicate new iPhone colours. But also, she writes, the WWDC logo could indicate nothing at all. The tickets to WWDC were sold out in a couple of minutes leaving a lot of people who should really be attending without access, apart from the video links which may only go part of the way for some. In an article from MacNN (among others), it appears that Apple is aware of the problems this may be likely to cause, so in some cases is contacting those whom it thinks really should have the chance and are offering extra tickets.
I have commented a lot in recent months on the falling share prices of Apple and I put it at the door of Wall Street analysts and ovine pundits who do not understand the long-term game that Apple is in and only seek short term gains. John-Michael Bond on TUAW examines the recent erosion in margins at Apple and how this set off the latest panic with Wall Street. He uses the analysis of Horace Dediu who puts the difference at the door of the iPhone and the iPad: the price has stayed the same, the cost of components has risen. This article was spoiled by speculation on the cheapo iPhone which I believe is unlikely to ever see the light of day, nor leave the minds of analysts.
So the Apple detractors will see in the reduced share evidence that Apple is doomed, while others may note that the market has changed and Apple sold more. What the survey does not include is margins per unit. Nor does it include throughput sales (apps, services). Also not mentioned is the number of models that each company produces. However another report, this time from Chitika Insights, suggests that Samsung is on the back foot when it comes to tablet computers and that the "iPad share of Web traffic in North American is holding firm at 82%". Samsung has doubled their share (how many headlines will have that only?) to 4% Patently Apple reports, adding comments from Chitika that "The cause of the disparity itself could be due to differences in the user interface, or demographic differences in each tablet's existing user base." Users really like their iPads. Which is the perfect moment to bring in an article from Electronista who report the findings of this year's J. D. Power Tablet Satisfaction Study. They report that the iPad is the best on the market and was top for the 2nd time with a perfect score in the five indicators of satisfaction. Performance was the most important, followed by ease of operation, styling and design, features, and cost.
However, Aaron Lee and Joseph Tsai of Digitimes (recently cited as a Samsung shill) report that it is expected that MacBook (sic) shipments are to grow by some 10% in the next quarter and that their source claims that "The orders in May are expected to be mainly Haswell-based models". The article continues, ". . . Apple did not have strong notebook shipments in the first quarter" but omits the point that shipments were far better than all other PC manufacturers in a market that was depressed anyway. Take from this what you will. [My link for this was MacDaily News.] A later report in AppleInsider that highlights the opinions of analyst Ming-Chi Kuo of KGI Securities suggests that Apple will announce upgrades to the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air line and suggests that Haswell processors are to be used. There is always a chance, but this seems to copy the rumours from DigiTimes, and WWDC is never really a time when new hardware is to the fore. Indeed, Jay Yarrow on Business Insider thinks that the next big thing from Apple is to be not hardware but software. I am not sure I agree totally with his theories - with a new version of iOS to be discussed, the next iPhone will surely be mentoned, at least in passing - but a lot of analysts miss that the glue holding it all together is the software, which is pretty much what Steve Jobs said at the 2007 iPhone announcement. [My source for this was MacDaily News.]
These analysts have proved themselves to be worse than useless, especially over the iPhone replacement. We have heard, rumours about the 5S - or whatever the pundits are calling it this week - for months with definite release dates for May up to June, as well as new types, large screens, cheap versions, coloured versions, bigger cameras and all the rest from analysts who keep telling consumers (and Apple) what Apple must do. Without doubt, some consumers have put off buying the iPhone 5 because of that virtual Odborne Effect, thus limiting Apple's growth, then blaming Tim Cook for this among other evils.
One of the publications dedicated to the sorts of applications that engineers and architects need for work on Macs is Architosh and this week Anthony Frausto-Robledo has an interview with Micah Dickerson, product manager for AutoCAD for Mac. One of the things to come from that is the comment that AutoCAD is "picking up adoption among the student population. We see tons and tons of downloads", but perhaps more important, "college students in CAD-using majors are adopting the Mac as their preferred computer of choice by something like 80 percent or greater" even if they are taught the subjects in a Windows-using environment. Another point (on the second page of the interview) was that Autodesk "are finding . . . that the majority of Mac users report little or no concern about using cloud services or storing files in the cloud, as compared to Windows users" and also that half of the Mac users are using notebook computers. [My source for this was MacDaily News.]
In the meantime, Tim Cook took a trip down to Duke University where he had studied some 25 years before. He graduated from the Fuqua School of Business in 1988, I am not sure how that is pronounced, and spoke at the school's Real Conversations with Real Leaders forum, Mike Beasley reports on 9to5 Mac. There are some photographs, some tweets but as yet no video or transcript.
In San Francisco, things are a little different and Chris Matyszczyk reports that the police there are going round certain areas offering to sell stolen iPhones. If the offer is accepted (no price is mentioned) the would-be buyer is arrested. Not everyone (including criminals of course) is happy about this tactic which looks to me to have something of the agent provocateur about it. Sure, anyone would go for a cheap iPhone and this weekend a report by Twitter of a Thai border market had the iPhone 5 (with only 4 rows of apps) available for 1,400 baht. It runs Android apparently.
Half and HalfOver the last year or so there has been much pressure on Apple to reduce its reliance on Samsung as a manufacturer of parts, especially with the litigation, and the suggestions in some quarters that, despite the alleged internal firewall, showing Samsung the crown jewels for manufacturing purposes, might mean they had a head start on ideas for their own products.It was not possible simply to shut the door, so bit by bit Apple has begun to move away, with some manufacturing moving to Taiwan for example. Now Patently Apple reports that dropping Samsung as a supplier for LCD displays has hit the company and it is reported that "both the semiconductor and display panel divisions suffered revenue decreases sequentially in the first quarter." How about that. . . .
Other MattersThere was an interesting court decision late last week which could have some wider implications. A fight between Microsoft and Motorola, part of Google of course, was less over the need to licence a patent, but more over what was the right price in one of those RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory - is that the same as FRAND [fair]) patents. Motoroloa wanted $4 billion for the patents (2.25% of the product price), Microsoft wanted to pay much less and the judge decided that the price should be between the two but at the lower end of the spectrum: $1.8 million a year, Steven Musil reports. As a number of sources have commented, the price that Google paid for Motorola (mainly for its patents collection) is now looking way too high.A more comprehensive report on this was written by Bryan Bishop on The Verge who includes a chart that really puts the differences between the Motorola demand, the Microsoft offer and the Judge's decision in context. As I mentioned in the last paragrpah Redmond's attorneys claim that on RAND patents, " Motorola violated that pact by asking far too much to use the patents in question". And now they must pay the price indeed.
Graham K. Rogers teaches at the Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University in Thailand. He wrote in the Bangkok Post, Database supplement on IT subjects. For the last seven years of Database he wrote a column on Apple and Macs. |
|
For further information, e-mail to