AMITIAE - Monday 25 June 2012
Cassandra - Monday Review: It will soon be Friday |
|
By Graham K. Rogers
Opening Gambit:The New York Times cannot see the wood for the trees: aims at Apple again; more research needed, less focus on the single target. Release date of Mountain Lion, maybe. More on not buying Apple products if you speak Farsi. Phantom vibrations and the iPhone. RIM, Nokia and now HTC: disappointing sales, pulls out of Brazil. BlackBerry to be split into two. Keep off the glass: Microsoft redefines, "hands on". Nicely designed, cylindrical routers from D-link: there is an app for it too. eXtensions podcasts. iPads for Thai schools.
Apple StuffEven before I start reading a NYTimes article on Apple these days, my defences are up. I have seen a number of times in the past, the negative painting of Apple by NYTimes writers, especially when they examined (and reexamined) the Chinese operations, primed by Mike Daisey's questionable input even though Wired had written on exactly the same subject several months before. The story of the boy who cried "wolf" is perhaps relevant here.When I started reading the article by David Segal (who is no longer on Tim Cook's Xmas card list), I had already seen a headline from an Apple-centric source that confirmed an air of negativity. Initially however I was hard pressed to find this as the opening paragraphs included a section comparing Apple's wages to other stores in the retail sector and the recent pay rises were mentioned too. Apple was higher than some, lower than others. Just because it is around the same as other retailers is just not good enough for the NYTimes and as I began to look through I was more annoyed so ended up writing a 1200 word article that I put online. The NYTimes piece was less investigation than opinion salted with anecdotes.
This was picked up by the BBC site later and then I saw the ante had been upped even more when Gita Kashani wrote an open letter to Tim Cook and Apple on Huffington Post concerning this apparent discrimination of people through language. She is right and Apple needs to jump on this from a great height immediately. Another article on Huffington Post about this matter was cross about Apple. Bitta Mostofi did not manage to mention the location of the store at all. Why would she? Apple is corporately responsible for all its staff and including Apple -- even when you are airing other dirty laundry -- is a good way to garner hits. Apple HQ may not have been aware initially of the actions by the over-active retail staff in Georgia, but I am sure they are now.
Half and HalfThere was lots of news this week concerning Judge Posner's decision to throw out the entire Apple v Motorola litigation, more perhaps out of frustration with the lawyers over compensation than any patent wrongdoing by either company. Foss Patents has the usual excellent analysis of the decision and its implications. He also has some enthusiastic comments concerning what the Judge wrote in his Opinion about FRAND: critical in modern technology. Both Edward Moyer on CNET and Chris Ziegler on The Verge also have information about the Judge's decisions.
Other MattersIt is not only RIM and Nokia that are in trouble, although if you speak to anyone related to those companies, you would be told that everything is fine, like De Niro, in Awakenings as Leonard always saying, "Never better, never better" as he clearly declines. Now HTC has joined the club. With sales diminishing, the company surprised a lot of people on Friday by announcing that "after analyzing the sales numbers" it was pulling out of Brazil, Mikey Campbell reports on AppleInsider.
While we are on the BlackBerry maker, Dante D'Orazio on The Verge (as well as other reports) are referring to a report in the UK Sunday Times that suggests there is a plan at RIM to split the company into two: handsets and messaging. They had better do something quickly as day by day what is left of the once-stimulating company is fading away.
In an article on Marketing Land, Danny Sullivan is quite angry at the way Microsoft controlled the event tightly last week, even taking away the Surface if it looked as if journalists were about to discover something. He is just as angry about columns (and there were several) that gave readers the idea that there were hands-on sessions with the device. Some of the images that appeared online and in print helped give this false impression, he claims. His critical article is well worth a read. Sullivan's article is complemented by another on ZDNet by James Kendrick who appears in two minds about the hands on experience (or lack). He writes, "It's understandable that Microsoft is being careful with the impressions these early version tablets give the public. The approach is standard for not-yet-released hardware for some companies." In other words it was probably not ready and John Gruber's assessment about hastiness was on target. He also compares the no-touch HP TouchPad and the very hands-on iPad releases. This approach is all a little different to Apple who let me and many others in journalist parties handle the first iPhone the day after Steve Jobs announced it in 2007; and the launch of the iPad had lots of devices all ready for the writers to put their fingers all over; while some had had their own to play with for a couple of weeks. Not with Redmond; not with the Surface. Paul Thurrott who is as Microsoft-centric as anyone was brutally honest about the Surface release,
The devices that Microsoft showed off earlier this week weren't real; they were simply prototypes. And anyone claiming to have gotten "hands-on" time with a Surface tablet was exaggerating, at best: No one was allowed to touch a working prototype, so those typing videos occurred on dead pieces of hardware without a working screen. For that integrity, he has risen immensely in my opinions of him. As a late note on this, no one is really sure of the pricing of the Surface, although some rumours have suggested it will be $599 and $799 for the two versions respectively. Apple, remember, introduced the first iPad at $499. I was re-running parts of a video that has the introduction and Steve Sinovsky said that the price will be "compatible with ultrabook PCs" which sounds to me a lot more expensive than a tablet computer and also defines how Microsoft thinks about the device. Despite what was said, this is not an iPad competitor. I was rerunning that video as I will use it in teaching presentation skills this week: you know the bits along with Ballmer's Monkey Boy Dance illustrating what not to do: Sinovsky's balletic hop skip and jump when the Surface failed is a great example.
Local ItemsFor the second time, I managed to push out a podcast this week with the feeds loading properly and appearing in the iTunes store pretty much as it should, with the most recent at the top of the list. With the medium expected to have a resurgence with the release of the next version of iOS, I hope I am back on track for regular output here.
A government spokesman is quoted as saying, "We'll use the seven-inch display tablet with a median price of 3,400 baht per unit. The 10-inch tablet costing 6,000 baht per unit is too expensive." Apple seems to be saying, OK, we have let you start your project and the first of the cheapo Chinese tablets with Android have arrived here, sort of, but now we are going to let the kids see what they really should be using. Every time you go past an iStudio in Bangkok, there are school-kids in uniform playing with the iPads. They know.
Late News
Graham K. Rogers teaches at the Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University in Thailand. He wrote in the Bangkok Post, Database supplement on IT subjects. For the last seven years of Database he wrote a column on Apple and Macs. |
|
For further information, e-mail to