AMITIAE - Wednesday 19 June 2012
Cassandra - Wednesday Review - The Week in Full Swing |
|
By Graham K. Rogers
Opening Gambit:Closing comments on WWDC. Apple profits, market cap ($545 billion) and share prices. Repair or not repair, that is the question. Apple's anti-1984 patent. Mac hints and tips. Not just vulnerabilities in software, now the x86 processor has one as well: fixes to come. The Surface: Microsoft's belated magnesium answer to fondling. News from RIM and Nokia: ups and downs and downs. James Murdoch's secret iPhone and his £12,000 bill.
Apple StuffWith WWDC more or less behind us, I was interested to see a longish article by Rene Ritchie on iMore concerning a look back at the team's week there. Unlike the times I have been able to attend, when Apple whisked us away after the Keynote speech, these guys went to loads of the sessions and tracked down a lot of the players. Rene has some praise for Cook who has filled out a lot in the CEO position and the way Phil Schiller fits the presentations like an old jacket. He also praises the efforts of Craig Federighi and Scott Forestall, also very comfortable with what he is doing.
The article I first referred to last week was by Richard Gaywood on TUAW and he now has a useful follow up examining the arguments for and against written in the light of the reactions to his article, the comments on Wired and other input on the question. There is though the question of repair when things go wrong and not everyone has the luxury of the US market and the higher levels of income there. One of my students has a MacBook Pro with Thunderbolt which failed one month out of warranty (life's like that). The local agent advised her correctly that, out of warranty it would be charged and the fee would be in excess of 20,000 baht for a new motherboard: the whole thing would be swapped out. Right now she uses it without connecting via Thunderbolt and it works OK, but I want her to do a presentation (like all the students in the class) so she asked me if she could borrow my Mac. After a few seconds silence I did agree to this, but pushed her about the repair and told her about Mac Home Service who I have seen repair Macs for a couple of thousand baht when the agent was ready to change the motherboard -- that is how Apple has them do things as they are not a repair service. The shop I told her about is in Sam Sen area between Phaholyothin Road and Vipphavadi-Rangsit and the website has a map. They don't really speak English there, so take a friend if your Thai is not that good: they do speak Mac; and they do sell and buy older machines. Which reminds me, I have an iPad 2 for sale if anyone is interested.
Have a look at the firewall logs for a start and see how many times a minute there are attempts to get in; and add to that the way our data is stored here there and everywhere, so that I cannot even go shopping without my name appearing. There is good and bad to this, but along with the good uses of data, there are always those who want to abuse information. The background in this article is so good I saved a copy with a mind to using it in a course on Ethics and Morals that I sometimes teach.
Half and HalfWe are used to discovering about new vulnerabilities found in software with browsers and Adobe Flash sometimes topping the lists, but these are easily fixable up to a point as long as the companies take the time. But Evan Rodgers on The verge reports on a security problem with every x86-64 Intel processor: " originally thought to be Linux-specific, but was only recently found to be exploitable in Windows, BSD, and potentially OS X." The analysis in the article is rather complex but interesting nevertheless. Microsoft has released a patch and others may follow.
No hanky panky in the back yard when Apple is on a fly-by, but presumably the rest of us can whistle Dixie? And the good Senator should also be careful how he uses Twitter or other online services as one New York politician was not so prudent.
The SurfaceThis is a rarity: a complete section on Cassandra devoted to Microsoft, and not Microsoft doing wrong. It may not be perfect, but Redmond has taken on board some lessons with its interesting answer to tablet computing with its new Surface. Forget that the name was used for the experimental table-like computer: if this works, in 6 months no one will remember that.Knowing that something was coming (some rumours suggested a Nokia link, others Barnes & Noble -- both wrong) I was ready for an influx of news early Tuesday morning here after the afternoon announcement in California after my bedtime.
And then he got really interested, writing at one point, "Details are still thin. But I'll give my uninformed immediate reaction: if Apple made a Mac like this, I'd be vibrating with excitement." [Praise indeed, but there were similar comments from many when the Kindle Fire was announced.] Jason Snell (MacWorld) also Tweeted, "Surface is already a more interesting iPad competitor than any Android-based tablet. Google really blew an opportunity to stake out ground." I was not sure if they were communicating (I expect they do follow each other) Ihnatko responded with "If Google doesn't pull the god-DAMNED-est rabbit out of its hat soon, Android on tablets is dead. Or, deader."
It also struck me as a little late to come to the table and suggest it was a novel idea to have integrated hardware and software. Two points here: have we not been following the iPhone/iPad since January 2010 (2007 for the iPhone); and is that an admission that prior to this software and hardware have not been integrated on Microsoft-related installations? I also noted a lovely example from Steve Ballmer of Steve Jobs' speak: It's 9.3mm thin, we were told. I bet it "just works like magic" too.
The Verge also has a 9-point All you Need to Know article linking to all their output with comments and facts from their various writers: a useful one-stop link; there is a video link there too. One of the links I referenced was from AppleInsider -- Apple people are just as interested in this as it at last shows some real commitment on the format by Microsoft. In the article, there was an exploded view of the Surface as provided by Endgadget. Like Mary Jo (above) this item notes that this is not actually made by Microsoft, but then are Macs made by Apple? At least it shows a commitment, which has drooped to a great extent when other manufacturers are examined. Another Mac view (and unsurprisingly a little biased) came from MacDaily News who looks at the specs and makes a suitable comment, particularly concerning the involvement of Microsoft partners. MDN thinks it is vapourware: with no release date and no price, this is possible, but would be such an embarrassment for Microsoft and particularly Ballmer, that it might be difficult to recover from the inevitable fallout. I think it will be on sale, but what happens after the original enthusiasm dies down, is the key. Also on MacDaily News, Steve Jack is totally unconvinced and thinks Microsoft is suicidal here: "They just can't let go. When they need to reinvent themselves, they simply can't bring themselves to do it." The tablet is a PC in disguise. Over on the MacObserver, Bryan Chaffin has a look at the outline and specifications and confirms this as the "embodiment of Microsoft's stated belief that media tablets should be extensions of the PC" which is anathema over at Cupertino.
I am often critical of the Register when it comes to Apple reports and their contempt for Cupertino appears in many ways, not the least is the insistence on the use of "fondleslab" rather than "tablet" or iPad. So when Microsoft produces a An interesting comment from Electronista about the Surface tells us that the Gorilla Glass used is 0.98 mm thick (or thin in new-Ballmerspeak). On The NextWeb, Brad McCarty looked at two sides of the question in one of the more balanced opinion articles on the new device, commenting on just what is so good about it and where Microsoft aimed and missed the target. Another fair look came from Matt Burns on Tech Crunch who makes a necessary (and non-partisan) comparison with the iPad and its eco-structure: what the Surface has to compete with. He makes an excellent point that this is less about challenging Apple than a mark for other manufacturers in the PC field to aim for. On ZDNET which is usually not considered pro-Mac, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is aghast: "What were you thinking?" he asks Microsoft. Oh this is well worth a read: I will not spoil it for you; but he thinks there is a cascade of errors here. In the cold light of day -- after all the initial flush of possible success -- a couple of sites are less convinced. Fox News had a look and John R. Quain heads his article with "the great copier surfaces again" and in the article writes, "The market may not need a Windows tablet, but Microsoft desperately does." A good read here. While over at The Motley Fool it is suggested that the Surface could be as successful as the Zune. The KIN phone is also mentioned: another MS dud. Sage words in this article. A late comment from Justin Watt who is a Mac aficionado who works with a company that has many Windows installations too, in "Goliath Wants David's Market". He suggests that the OS will not matter as despite their familiarity with Windows, those users also love the iPad and the iPhone. And local writer, Woody, on InfoWorld comments on what we do not know about the Surface. He is reserved despite the general euphoria in the MS World. I also saw a BBC report on the News in the evening here, and while the expert was polite enough, neither he nor the newsreader, George Alagiah, showed any sort of burning desire for this. One of the interviewees they showed commented on how old ladies would love this because of the way it would help them work with the PC, but as Apple has shown, many older people have flocked to the iPad precisely because a computer and more to the point, computer knowledge, are not needed.
With the problems Apple has with publicity and litigation when an iPhone has emitted smoke, let's hope there are no problems of this nature: surely they have this covered? An overnight thought reminded me that my Nikon camera is magnesium too and that is problem free.
Other MattersAs if there were not enough problems up in Waterloo, Celestica, a Canadian company that had a contract with RIM for manufacturing services has decided to "wind down" over the next few months Matt Burns reports on Tech Crunch. Another indication that the game is up: and to repeat, this is not through a bad product (although there was some updating needed) but through poor management.
Facebook cannot stop buying things and this week Dante D'Orazio writes on The Verge about the acquisition of face-recognition company Face.com which had been rumoured for a while.
Local ItemsWe mentioned a while back a controversy in northern Malaysia concerning a plant for processing rare earths that an Australian company wanted to build. Lots of protests and disagreement, but we are told this week in The Straits Times that a parliamentary committee has given the go-ahead. In most countries that would lead straight to more protests and litigation as the panel may be putting commercial interests over those of the people who live in the affected area.
Late NewsGoogle has launched a native iPhone app for Google Offers which is similar to the Android one (Frederic Lardinois, Tech Crunch)
Graham K. Rogers teaches at the Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University in Thailand. He wrote in the Bangkok Post, Database supplement on IT subjects. For the last seven years of Database he wrote a column on Apple and Macs. |
|
For further information, e-mail to